May
31It’s Hilarious
…but so embarrassing.
http://www.ebizmba.com/articles/ebizmba25.html
Huh?!? How did Photobucket beat Craigslist (#6). I have never searched for jobs or whores on Photobucket. What about Flickr (#7)? This just doesn't seem right. At least Wikipedia is up there. It might have some accuracy problems, but at least people are reading.
Firefox can look awfully Web 1.0 on Ubuntu. Thankfully there is a quick and easy fix for this.
So close Firefox and open a terminal window.
Now start Firefox. That's it!
The hilarious Bill Caco is at it again. This time he is fighting his way through tons of mediocre (at best) movie spoofs in Yahoo's MTV Movie Awards Spoof Competition. Casino Royale With Cheese stands out from the rest. The production value is incredible. With witty dialog, perfect impersonations, a one-eyed dog, a very hot Bond girl, and Jon Liu, this spoof is hands down the favorite to win. If you don't believe me, check it out…and give this movie the 5 stars it deserves!
Well, we had the winning ticket for the Preakness. Too bad a $1 trifecta paid $25. Yeah, last year it paid $1,995. It's rare you have the top 3 favorites finish in the top 3. At that point I would have liked to see Street Sense pull it out so we can root for a Triple Crown. I guess there is always next year. I love this sport. Only 20 days till Belmont.
"Rev." Jerry Falwell died today. There is no better way to remember him than by looking (and archiving) some of his most famous quotes.
I could continue posting these until I run out of hard drive space on the server. Falwell was an evil charlatan. A quick Google search of him and you will see countless articles on the millions he raised for political and personal gain via God. Why does a man of God need so much money? How can one spread so much hate in the name of Jesus? Doesn't this offend the real Christians? This man was mocking your very beliefs. He took advantage of your blind faith for profit and power. He imposed his own will in the name of God. Jerry Falwell had the fattest neck I have ever seen.
The term "illegal number" or "illegal hex number" has been bothering me so much that I am compelled to post yet again. Everyday I think about this and try to rationalize the concept. I don't understand it. It goes beyond my "God-given" right of freedom of speech. It's a number. It is being claimed by someone for the sole purpose of profit. Or at least protection of profit.
The entire idea of intellectual property is a quandary amongst itself. In theory, I can think of the exact same thing as someone else. We can think of the same joke, write the same story, code the same computer program. The complexities of the algorithms, the syntax of sentences, and the delivery of the joke change it enough to make it unique. Of course patents were invented to protect the inventions. We have always known great minds think alike. Copyrights for scripts and Trademarks for logos protect us in a first come basis. What we have here different. It's a number. This number was thought of by a human and is used as a key to a lock. If I purchase a lock, sans the key, don't I have every right to pick that lock with any tool I can find?
Suppose a company hired me to write the lock (encryption) for their DVDs. Suppose I was a very lazy programmer (no laughing). I have to come up with an encryption method that uses a key — a number that is stored on a chip inside your DVD player. Within 2 hours I have finished my encryption algorithm. I am too tired to mess with that base 16 (hexadecimal) stuff. All those Fs and Ds remind me of HTML colors. I kept my code short and sweet. I wrote my lock and my key. My key is the number 4.
Am I supposed to sue everyone who posts the number 4? Or am I just suing the people who say, the "key to unlock Josh's DVD encryption is the number 4"? The latter would be more reasonable but what is the difference? The key is out. Users will use far more cryptic blog posts to display the key. They found the key. They didn't steal it from my personal computer. They decrypted my super awesome encryption. It didn't take them long but now I am going to have to lobby congress to make the entire number 4 illegal. It doesn't matter what you write or what you say. Your intent doesn't matter. Number 4 will no longer be used by anyone but me and my DVDs.
This is obviously too silly to happen, but it has. They (MPAA, Congress) want you to believe it is the complexity of a base 16 number that makes it subjectable to law. It's not an everyday number, so it can belong to someone. It's their number. So a simple, everyday integer like 4 can never be illegal but a more complex number, that's up for grabs?
Have we lost this much touch with ethics? Are we unable to see this for what it is? It's the intent. It's the intent to break your lock and steal your stuff and sell it. It's not illegal if I buy a lock, pick it and open it, in my own home. I didn't intend to anything wrong. I didn't steal anything. I didn't sell anything. I just thought of a number…that I may have read somewhere.
"One of the running debates of these playoffs: Is Bruce Bowen a cheap player? I love the fact that anyone's actually debating this — if your answer is 'no,' or your answer is 'I'm not sure,' then you've obviously never played basketball in your life. Bruce Bowen is a cheap player. There's no debate. He's not some clumsy power forward who can't stay out of his own way (like Mark Madsen), or even some uncoordinated center who can't remember to keep his elbows near his body (like Shawn Bradley). He's a world-class athlete who has complete control over every inch of his body at all times."
Bill Simmons - ESPN
: I added the infinite blog scroll. No more pagination. Only one small problem, but it's being worked out
: Do you know the difference between me and volt stone? I am chuck norris
: Big up on the wall. Word. Wu Tang
: This is the very first wall post. Just like facebook just much much cooler